You all, fools: *getting tattoos based on the ancient tattoos they find on bog mummies and the other ancient dead that for all you know will bind you to a forgotten god that now by all rights has a claim on your life for better or for worse*
Me, and intellectual: *doesnt fucking do that*
A forgotten god cannot run my life any worse than I am currently running it myself.
Bog mummy take the wheel
one of the things that bothers me most about posts which imply (or outright state) that all men are inherently abusive, aside from the fact that it’s objectively untrue, is that it normalises and excuses abuse – if abusiveness is inseparable from maleness and masculinity, then abusive men aren’t really accountable for their actions, because by that logic they can’t help it. this also falsely implies that there is no alternative male behaviour, which is incredibly dangerous and absolutely contributes to victim blaming where the perpetrator was a man. men can be gentle! men can be loving! if you’re attracted to men, accept nothing less, and never place the blame on your own attraction to men if you are poorly treated rather than on the man in question for actively choosing to mistreat you.
i will never wear them as pants because i dislike having a butt, i would never wear them, i would queue anything for love, kinda like halter tops, they are p much pants, this does not make them not tops
the thing is literally NO ONE cares if u dont think leggings count as pants. no one. no one cares. everyones gonna keep wearing them as pants. theyre pants. no one cares what u think
10, a pdf of Why Does He Do That which i am rereading, and of course tungle, email, i would queue anything for love, infinitelooper because i have to listen to I Would Die For U on repeat in order to get any writing done, the episode list for the insight podcast, the nanowrimo site, the wikipedia page for stephen hillenburg, two wikia entries for skyrim
How many tabs do u have open right now and what are they